• 0.82 MB
  • English
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL20770849M

Combining unprecedented analyses of the genocide's progression and the logistical limitations of humanitarian military intervention, Kuperman reaches a startling conclusion: even if Western leaders had ordered an intervention as soon as they became aware of a nationwide genocide in Rwanda, the intervention forces would have arrived too late to Reviews: 6.

The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention. critics say to the»humanitarian«politicians or soldiers, to intervene in this case when you didn't intervene in that one – as if, having declined to challenge China in Tibet, say, the United Nations should have stayed out of East Timor for the sake of moral consistency.

Humanitarian. The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention Michael Walzer ▪ Winter There is nothing new about human disasters caused by human beings.

We have always been, if not our own, certainly each other’s worst enemies. Humanitarian Intervention - edited by J. Holzgrefe February On 6 AprilPresident Habyarimana of Rwanda and several top government officials were killed when their plane was shot down by a surface-to-air missile on its approach to Kigali airport.

Rajan Menon’s new book, The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention, launches a timely argument against a dominant argument lying behind so much of modern American foreign policy. State of Rebellion: Violence and Intervention in the Central African Republic (African Arguments) Paperback – Decem and humanitarian action that rests upon a politics of redistribution and acknowledgement of the social dignity of fighters lacking a state.” Reviews: 4.

HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMAN WELFARE 19 If Hehir’s book lays the conceptual and empirical groundwork for understanding and taking stock of the current debate about humanitarian intervention, James Pattison’s book, Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene?, seeks to move the debate forward regarding which actors in.

Humanitarian Intervention has been defined as a state's use of military force against another state, with publicly stating its goal is to end human rights violations in that state." This definition may be too narrow as it precludes non-military forms of intervention such as humanitarian aid and international this broader understanding, "Humanitarian intervention should be.

According to William Easterly in his book The White Man’s Burden (), humanitarian intervention is ultimately just modern recreations of the infamous colonial arrogance of the past. Easterly sums up his argument within his book’s long title; “the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good”.

The book also offers a prescriptive analysis of how ethical arguments could be deployed to deal with the problem of humanitarian intervention. Co-winner of the APSA Jervis-Schroeder Prize for the best book on international history and politics.


The best books on Humanitarian Intervention recommended by Philip Cunliffe. Lecturer in international conflict says the idea that it is right and legitimate for states to intervene in others’ affairs is a very dangerous trend, especially in the name of humanitarianism. The book also offers a prescriptive analysis of how ethical arguments could be deployed to deal with the problem of humanitarian intervention.

Co-winner of the APSA Jervis-Schroeder Prize for the best book on international history and politics. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention.

Argument and Change in World Politics book. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. Arguments have consequences in world politics that a /5(7). Humanitarian intervention is a controversial concept in international politics because it often involves one country intervening militarily in another country, which requested the intervention.

Tony Blair, former British prime minister, equated humanitarian intervention with the concept of "Responsibility to Protect.". The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention. Reference: Dissent Magazine / Dissent Magazine, Winter By Michael Walzer.

The question of humanitarian intervention has to be rethought thoroughly for our time. Today, it is nearly impossible to commit crimes against humanity in secret; efficient communication media will bring them.

Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty. The language and practice of humanitarian intervention is far from new. It has been the source of incessant argument by lawyers, theologians, and philosophers for generations, even centuries.

The History of Humanitarian Intervention Words | 5 Pages. The history of Humanitarian intervention is a controversial one.

In March the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) justified the use of force against Yugoslavia, a country that at this time was having a number of atrocities being committed within it.

The moral justification for humanitarian intervention is intimately linked to the legal principles which further entrench the obligation of intervention. Thus, to separate the moral and legal argument for humanitarian intervention, as many authors have done, is a mistake, because the international laws which provide the legal justification for.

Most notably the book develops a much stronger theoretical link between the moral justification for intervention and revolution, whilst at the same time outlining the dangers of retrospectively justifying intervention on the sole basis that it manages to bring about a humanitarian end.

Thus, this book provides an important overview of the. Analysis of all the Legal and Moral Issues Surrounding Humanitarian Intervention The deaths of innocent persons & the Doctrine of Double Effect Governmental legitimacy: The Doctrine of Effective Political Control UN Charter & evaluation of the Nicaragua ruling The Morality of not intervening US-led invasion of Iraq Humanitarian intervention authorized by the UN Security.


Humanitarian Intervention Humanitarian intervention means the use of force in a state so as to end violations of fundamental human rights of persons without permission from the state. Many are times that humanitarian intervention is offered only when situations are already worse, when many people are dead (Holzgrefe, & Keohane, ).

“humanitarian,”“intervention,”and “ethics.”“Humanitarian”refers principally to the motives for the intervention, namely, to save foreigners from the ills inflicted upon them by their rulers or by powerful, protected groups in their own country. But since motives are always complex, this motive need only be dominant, not.

Humanitarian Intervention as a World-Wide Controversy The issue of humanitarian intervention has become increasingly prominent in worldwide debates regarding its role in ethics and legitimacy in international relations. Uncertainty arises as to whether there are any moral obligation for humanitarian intervention and the concerning justifications of the violation of.

Chapter 1 focused on accomplishing two tasks; first, demonstrating that a moral obligation of humanitarian intervention is possible, and second, identifying the existence conditions for such an obligation. Building upon the groundwork laid in Chapter 1, the discussion in Chapter 2 is directed at accomplishing three distinct, but related tasks.

Michael Walzer the Argument About Humanitarian Intervention 21 I Intend a “Return” to the Question of Humanitarian Intervention, in Order to Review, Restate, and Revise (There Are in Fact Some Important Revisions) the Argument About Intervention That I.

legal right to unilateral humanitarian intervention. These include (1) an argument from unfairness in the application of the law (i.e., which states are likely to find the right in question exercised against them); (2) an argument that recognition of such a right, even if morally unproblematic itself, will lead inevitably down.

Humanitarian Intervention Essay Words | 8 Pages. The key objections to humanitarian intervention include the conflict of interests with the self-interested state and sovereignty, the difficulty of internal legitimacy, the problematical Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, and the debate over legality of intervention.

The book also analyzes how argument might be used to to remake contemporary world politics, suggesting how such arguments apply to the issue of humanitarian intervention. Product Details About the AuthorPrice: $ The best statement of Rawls’ position on international relations is in his book The Law of Peoples ().

Just to highlight two aspects of what Rawls says apropos to humanitarian intervention. First, Rawls does not consider the original position as an appropriate argument for conceiving the basic structure of hierarchical societies.

Conor Foley has a message for the international community: Humanitarian interventions rarely work.


His recent book promoting that. When it was originally published, Humanitarian Intervention was unanimously regarded as an important and controversial book. In this new and expanded edition, Professor Teson includes recent cases of humanitarian intervention, notably those authorized by the United Nations Security Council.4/5(5).

The selectivity of humanitarian intervention, so the argument goes, reduces the risk of over commitment; it helps to maintain cooperation among the great powers; and it prevents the UN from becoming involved in ill-conceived operations (see Roberts and Zaum ).Plato’s Republic and Humanitarian Intervention This paper will attempt to help bridge the gap between morality and self-interest in the argument over humanitarian intervention through the application of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato’s thought as found in his book “Republic”.

Platonic thought is of course central to the western.